🔗 Share this article

The composer Avril Coleridge-Taylor constantly bore the pressure of her parent’s reputation. Being the child of the renowned Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, one of the best-known English artists of the turn of the 20th century, the composer’s identity was cloaked in the lingering obscurity of history.

An Inaugural Recording

Not long ago, I contemplated these legacies as I made arrangements to make the first-ever recording of her piano concerto from 1936. Featuring emotional harmonies, heartfelt tunes, and valiant rhythms, this piece will grant audiences fascinating insight into how the composer – a wartime composer who entered the world in 1903 – conceived of her world as a female composer of color.

Past and Present

Yet about the past. It requires time to adapt, to recognize outlines as they really are, to tell reality from misinterpretation, and I was reluctant to address Avril’s past for a while.

I had so wanted the composer to be a reflection of her father. To some extent, she was. The rustic British sounds of her father’s impact can be detected in numerous compositions, such as From the Hills (1934) and Sussex Landscape (1940). Yet it suffices to examine the names of her family’s music to realize how he heard himself as both a standard-bearer of British Romantic style as well as a representative of the African heritage.

It was here that Samuel and Avril began to differ.

American society evaluated Samuel by the brilliance of his music instead of the his racial background.

Family Background

As a student at the prestigious music college, her father – the son of a Sierra Leonean father and a British mother – turned toward his African roots. At the time the African American poet this literary figure came to London in the late 19th century, the young musician actively pursued him. He composed this literary work to music and the next year incorporated his poetry for a stage piece, Dream Lovers. This was followed by the choral composition that put Samuel on the map: Hiawatha’s Wedding Feast.

Drawing from Henry Wadsworth Longfellow’s The Song of Hiawatha, the piece was an worldwide sensation, especially with Black Americans who felt indirect honor as the majority assessed his work by the excellence of his art instead of the his race.

Principles and Actions

Recognition failed to diminish his beliefs. At the turn of the century, he participated in the initial Pan African gathering in London where he met the Black American thinker this influential figure and observed a range of talks, such as the subjugation of Black South Africans. He was a campaigner throughout his life. He sustained relationships with pioneers of civil rights including this intellectual and this leader, delivered his own speeches on equality for all, and even talked about issues of racism with the American leader on a trip to the US capital in 1904. Regarding his compositions, Du Bois recalled, “he wrote his name so high as a musician that it cannot soon be forgotten.” He died in the early 20th century, at 37 years old. However, how would the composer have made of his daughter’s decision to travel to this country in the mid-20th century?

Controversy and Apartheid

“Offspring of Renowned Musician expresses approval to S African Bias,” declared a title in the Black American publication Jet magazine. This policy “struck me as the appropriate course”, Avril told Jet. Upon further questioning, she qualified her remarks: she didn’t agree with apartheid “fundamentally” and it “could be left to resolve itself, directed by well-meaning people of diverse ethnicities”. Were the composer more aligned to her father’s politics, or from the US under segregation, she may have reconsidered about this system. However, existence had protected her.

Identity and Naivety

“I hold a English document,” she said, “and the government agents never asked me about my race.” So, with her “porcelain-white” complexion (according to the magazine), she traveled within European circles, lifted by their acclaim for her late father. She presented about her parent’s compositions at the University of Cape Town and led the broadcasting ensemble in the city, including the inspiring part of her composition, named: “In remembrance of my Father.” While a accomplished player herself, she did not perform as the lead performer in her work. On the contrary, she always led as the maestro; and so the segregated ensemble performed under her direction.

Avril hoped, in her own words, she “may foster a change”. But by 1954, circumstances deteriorated. When government agents became aware of her Black ancestry, she was forced to leave the nation. Her citizenship offered no defense, the British high commissioner advised her to leave or be jailed. She came home, feeling great shame as the extent of her inexperience became clear. “This experience was a hard one,” she expressed. Adding to her humiliation was the release in 1955 of her controversial discussion, a year after her unceremonious exit from the country.

A Familiar Story

Upon contemplating with these shadows, I felt a known narrative. The story of holding UK citizenship until it’s challenged – one that calls to mind Black soldiers who defended the UK in the second world war and survived only to be denied their due compensation. Including those from Windrush,