🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents applauding your advice on growing your business? Are headhunters reaching out to explore collaborations?

If not, the reason might be your gender.

The Experiment: Modifying Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Numerous women participated in an organized professional network test recently after viral posts indicated that changing their gender to "male" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers modified their profiles to incorporate what they called "masculine-oriented" terminology - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Brought Up

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether a built-in sexism in the platform's system favors men who use professional networking terminology.

Similar to many large networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which content are shown to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining post visibility. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how content perform.

Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your posts shows up in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "a masculine version", described remarkable results.

"The numbers I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, began experimenting after observing her reach decline significantly.

The Process

• Initially, she changed her profile gender to "male"
• Then, she used AI tools to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with similar "agentic" style

The outcome was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within one week.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my posts were more personal - brief and insightful, but also warm and relatable," she explained. "Currently, the masculine version was forceful and confident - like a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the test after one week, stating "Every day I persisted, and outcomes improved, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Not all testers encountered favorable results. Cass Cooper who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her race to "white" reported a decrease in reach and interaction.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it functions in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, leading to unofficial tests where identical content by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and spread content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

Company representative suggested that recent declines in some users' reach might stem from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and less controlled."