🔗 Share this article

The number of guaranteed positions for Māori representatives on NZ local authorities will be cut by over 50%, following a divisive law change that required municipal councils to put the fate of hard-won Māori seats to a popular referendum.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which may have one or more councillors depending on demographic data, were established in 2001 to provide Māori electors the option to vote for a guaranteed Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Originally, local governments were only able to create a Māori ward by initially submitting it to a public vote in their area. Communities frequently spent years building community backing and urging their councils to establish Indigenous representation.

Legislative Shifts and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the former administration allowed municipal authorities to establish a Indigenous seat without first requiring them to subject it to a popular ballot.

However, this year, the current administration reversed the change, saying communities ought to determine whether to introduce Indigenous representation.

Referendum Results

The coalition’s law change required local authorities that had created a ward under Labour’s rules to hold decisive public votes alongside the local body elections, which concluded on 11 October. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the referendum, 17 decided to retain their seats, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – showing numerous areas against reserved Indigenous seats.

The results provided “a crucial move in reinstating local democratic control.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have criticised the new policy as “racist” and “anti-Māori”. Since taking office, the current administration has ushered in sweeping rollbacks to policies designed to improve Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has stated it aims to terminate “ethnic-specific” policies, and says it is dedicated to improving outcomes for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

Outcomes of the public votes were divided down urban-rural lines – six of the seven cities required to vote backed Indigenous seats, while countryside areas skewed heavily towards removing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Voter Turnout and Criticism

The recent municipal polls recorded the smallest electoral participation in 36 years, with under one-third of citizens participating, prompting calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a farce”.

Comparative Treatment

Councils are permitted to create different wards – such as rural wards – without initially mandating a public vote. The different conditions placed on Māori wards indicated the administration was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Well, they failed. Many communities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark concerned the 17 areas that voted to retain their wards.